Ok, I've got an easier question. What percentage of radar posters would say that there is no question it's the 8 in 17 comeback?
GMAFB.Ok, I've got an easier question. What percentage of radar posters would say that there is no question it's the 8 in 17 comeback?
Sounds like you need to make a poll ...Ok, I've got an easier question. What percentage of radar posters would say that there is no question it's the 8 in 17 comeback?
Sounds like you need to make a poll ...
You were supposed to do a poll.
At least you're man enough to admit it.Putting aside the argument with @Raising Heel that I clearly lost, get a load of this:
If nobody touched the ball, A&M would've gotten the ball from the original spot of the inbounds under UNI's basket.If they had just chucked the ball all the way down the court and out of bounds, and made Texas A&M run their offense the whole length of the court, they'd still have won with ease.
If nobody touched the ball, A&M would've gotten the ball from the original spot of the inbounds under UNI's basket.
What JuleZ said is what I meant.Yes but once they had the ball inbounds (the two guys that each got trapped on the baseline and tried to bounce it off the defender, leading to layups) they could have flipped it down court with the clock running and if it went out of bounds at the far end it would have to be inbounded there, taking far more time.
LOL at Pack Pride. It's so obvious that that manalishi dude straight makes shit up and yet the Mooers just eat up his every word. They're a sad bunch.
It was in one of their hundreds of "UNC scandle [sic]" threads. I don't read those, but they started a new one and misspelled 'scandal' so I clicked on it just to see if anyone called the original poster out for it, and someone re-posted a manalishi post from a previous scandal thread. I'll post it below and let y'all laugh at it. There's so much fail and so much straight-up BS in it that I can't even.What's going on over there? You talking about a specific thread?
Yep. And that ain't even hyperbole -- it's legitimately true. If you take the time to go over there immediately after a bad Moo loss (so every game basically), the UNC scandal thread will be "hot" because they flock to it to make themselves feel better.LOL@State posters have been promising a major bombshell development for the last 4 years now. We're still waiting.
Since they have no athletic accomplishments to enjoy, the UNC scandal marks the cadence of Moo fans' pathetic lives.
Yep. And that ain't even hyperbole -- it's legitimately true. If you take the time to go over there immediately after a bad Moo loss (so every game basically), the UNC scandal thread will be "hot" because they flock to it to make themselves feel better.
Yeah that particular thread is all kinds of "we admit defeat because we suck." The premise of the thread is thus:At least some of them have become self-aware. Here's another quote from a different thread:
"Since NCSU athletics has to rely heavily on the failing of others to succeed, is Gottfried someone that could take advantage of this opportunity?"
That's the truth right there.
"Call it"And back to relevant basketball ...
Call it - who's going to the Elite Eight?
Kansas/Maryland
Miami/Villanova
Oregon/duke
Texas A&M/Oklahoma
UNC/Indiana
Notre Dame/Wisconsin
Virginia/Iowa State
Gonzaga/Syracuse
Also just a note of credit to the seeding committee, since they've gotten so much flak. They managed to arrange it so that even with six teams from the ACC making it to the Sweet 16 (8 games), none of them have to knock each other out in this round.
But really, I'm going with...And back to relevant basketball ...
Call it - who's going to the Elite Eight?
Kansas/Maryland
Miami/Villanova
Oregon/duke
Texas A&M/Oklahoma
UNC/Indiana
Notre Dame/Wisconsin
Virginia/Iowa State
Gonzaga/Syracuse
Also just a note of credit to the seeding committee, since they've gotten so much flak. They managed to arrange it so that even with six teams from the ACC making it to the Sweet 16 (8 games), none of them have to knock each other out in this round.
Also just a note of credit to the seeding committee
Yes.Are you referring to the NCAA or the fine folks on radar?![]()
And back to relevant basketball ...
Call it - who's going to the Elite Eight?
Kansas/Maryland
Miami/Villanova
Oregon/duke
Texas A&M/Oklahoma
UNC/Indiana
Notre Dame/Wisconsin
Virginia/Iowa State
Gonzaga/Syracuse
Also just a note of credit to the seeding committee, since they've gotten so much flak. They managed to arrange it so that even with six teams from the ACC making it to the Sweet 16 (8 games), none of them have to knock each other out in this round.
Eh? I chuckled a bit. Lot of folks thought/said they didn't deserve to be in the dance, and now they're in the Sweet 16. I guess they can be a little salty. Might as well do it now while they still can ...wth kind of bs is that?
Why anyone pays any attention to ANYTHING Pat Forde writes is beyond me. That dude is dumber than a bag of hammers.
That article was outstanding.Eh? I chuckled a bit. Lot of folks thought/said they didn't deserve to be in the dance, and now they're in the Sweet 16. I guess they can be a little salty. Might as well do it now while they still can ...
FIFYWhy anyone pays any attention to ANYTHINGPat Fordenational sports writers write is beyond me.
No, Pat Forde is worse. That dude is a moron mixed with a clicks/eyeballs whore.FIFY
Bump, and thoughts?I was listening to Atlanta radio an hour ago and the 9-noon show has former Atlanta Falcon and Villanova Wildcat Brian Finneran. Because of that connection, they have 'Nova coach Jay Wright on from time to time, including today. I gotta say.....he's an impressive interview and seems like a stand-up guy.
Any thought on him being a potential replacement once Roy hangs it up? I know, I know, JW isn't from within the family (!!!11!!!!1!!!), but frankly, I don't think we should go inside the family. Ex: Bubba Cunningham. Ex 2: Larry Fedora. Ex 3: Dean Smith. Ex 4: Mack Brown.