Good discussion. If I may:
I completely disagree. Neither of them are big time NBA prospects but as far as dominant college players go, those two were as good as it gets. Solid (and at times spectacular) production, exceptional leadership, real program guys. I love Kenny and Luke but I don't see either of those guys having the leadership capabilities of the outgoing duo.
When are people gonna learn?
C'mon now, you know Roy. If Seventh is on the roster to start next season, that means Roy has told him he gets first crack as the PG starter. And frankly, I agree with that decision based on the current make up of next year's roster. I don't want to thwart Coby's development because he's trying to run our system. He has AA ability at the 2 guard spot. But I fear he won't ever realize it if Roy forces him into playing the 1. I do think Little might start but that's only if Roy doesn't feel good about starting Brooks or Manley and still wants to plays small ball. If Brooks or Manley is ready, the starters for our first game will be:
Seventh
Kenny
Cam
Luke
Brooks/Manley
What?!! No. You think Little and Coby can give us 27 ppg, 10 rpg, 8 apg on 43% shooting next year? Hell to the no. Two stud freshman at OAD schools would have a hard time putting up that stat line let alone in Chapel Hill. I get that you're also factoring in the development of the bigs along with another year of Luke and kenny improving. But that's still a tall order. Frankly, I don't see Luke improving at all - at least his production. In fact, I see him taking a step back next year. He won't have Joel and Theo to set him up as well but I also think he's peaked. The second half of the season showed that the book was out on Luke. Teams started playing him differently and he struggled. And really, outside of the FT line, where could Luke really improve? It's not logical to think he'll improve his percentage from deep. He was amazing there for the bulk of the year. He hits the boards hard but he's limited. But teams are going to force Luke to drive the ball or to work with his back to the basket and in both cases, he's far less productive than when facing the basket. Kenny is a special defender, a good but not great shooter and a guy that's limited creating. I don't see a huge uptick from him either. He could become a little more consistent shooting the ball but other than that, I don't know where he drastically improves. And I already mentioned - to your last point - I just don't see Luke or Kenny as Joel or Theo level leaders. That's no knock on them. It's more a compliment to two guys that proved to be special leaders.
I don't know what to expect from BRob and Andrew. I really have no clue. Are they guys that could improve remarkably and be integral parts of the rotation next year or are they guys that in normal years wouldn't get much PT for our program? I could see them both going in either direction. But yes, big strides are going to be needed for Sterling and Garrison. I think they both will be significantly better next year. But neither guy has the full toolbox. Brooks is limited offensively and Manley is limited defensively. Neither will be a plus in the lacking area by next year. I just don't see that.
That's true. And I think Nas has some of that nastiness/feistiness that will drive the team's hunger. But I think our next real shot at a FF is 2021 and that's only if we can get Nas and Coby to stick it out. If not, the turnover is too great to overcome when we aren't landing top 10 guys regularly and Roy isn't proficient in managing the OAD talent and trying to build one year winners.