ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

strummingram said:
What???

I need some clarification on this one.

Oh, and D-Day guys rock.
Click to expand...
Trump is strongly for America, as strongly as a President has been in a very long time. Therefor if you hate Trump, you hate America. The dems want to continue to allow this great country to drift into a one-world socialistic shithole.

And don't give me that lame 'he bragged about assaulting women and said something vulgar' bullshit. If that really bothers you, please grow up.
 
bluetoe said:
feels right to me because hating obama is a direect result of my loving America.
Click to expand...
Okay... now, define "America", specifically. That sounds pretty vague. "Loving America" is sorta like saying "I love food."

bluetoe said:
Trump is strongly for America, as strongly as a President has been in a very long time. Therefor if you hate Trump, you hate America. The dems want to continue to allow this great country to drift into a one-world socialistic shithole.

And don't give me that lame 'he bragged about assaulting women and said something vulgar' bullshit. If that really bothers you, please grow up.
Click to expand...
"Strongly for America"... I dunno if you're aware, or care, but "America" means many different things to many different people. There isn't a universal definition of "America", except maybe if you define it geographically- where it is located on a map of the planet Earth. I hope that is something that the people who sacrificed their lives on Normandy Beach actually died for!

Trump loves Donald Trump. To whatever extent "America" plays into it, it's only to the extent that it allows Donald Trump to advertise himself and sell/expand his brand. And, the result of his efforts is nothing I'd be proud of. If THAT is "America", then America is hardly worth storming a beach and dying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heelmanwilm
strummingram said:
Okay... now, define "America", specifically. That sounds pretty vague. "Loving America" is sorta like saying "I love food."


"Strongly for America"... I dunno if you're aware, or care, but "America" means many different things to many different people. There isn't a universal definition of "America", except maybe if you define it geographically- where it is located on a map of the planet Earth. I hope that is something that the people who sacrificed their lives on Normandy Beach actually died for!

Trump loves Donald Trump. To whatever extent "America" plays into it, it's only to the extent that it allows Donald Trump to advertise himself and sell/expand his brand. And, the result of his efforts is nothing I'd be proud of. If THAT is "America", then America is hardly worth storming a beach and dying.
Click to expand...
do you want me to define 'food' for you also?

You are upset that Donald Trump is for Donald Trump? You're actually upset that he promotes himself? I'm for me, should I go ahead and turn myself in to the ego police? Trump can be for Trump and for America as well. On the other hand the Clintons, for example, are for the Clintons and damn the country except as it serves their needs. Obama wanted to impose his racist, socialistic vision of America on the rest of us. Trump wants to preserve the vision that he believes the founders had. So do I. I already gave you your answer, too bad you aren't perceptive enough to have seen what is there in black and white. Repeating oneself to one who doesn't want to see is tedious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terror Beard and keysersosay#1
bluetoe said:
do you want me to define 'food' for you also?

You are upset that Donald Trump is for Donald Trump? You're actually upset that he promotes himself? I'm for me, should I go ahead and turn myself in to the ego police? Trump can be for Trump and for America as well. On the other hand the Clintons, for example, are for the Clintons and damn the country except as it serves their needs. Obama wanted to impose his racist, socialistic vision of America on the rest of us. Trump wants to preserve the vision that he believes the founders had. So do I. I already gave you your answer, too bad you aren't perceptive enough to have seen what is there in black and white. Repeating oneself to one who doesn't want to see is tedious.
Click to expand...

Lol you are freaking lost, needed that laugh this morning to start the week.

Trump couldn't name you 5 people who signed the Declaration of Independence let alone know their vision.

You're a sheep.
 
  • Like
Reactions: carolinablue34, uncboy10, strummingram and 1 other person
bluetoe said:
do you want me to define 'food' for you also?

You are upset that Donald Trump is for Donald Trump? You're actually upset that he promotes himself? I'm for me, should I go ahead and turn myself in to the ego police? Trump can be for Trump and for America as well. On the other hand the Clintons, for example, are for the Clintons and damn the country except as it serves their needs. Obama wanted to impose his racist, socialistic vision of America on the rest of us. Trump wants to preserve the vision that he believes the founders had. So do I. I already gave you your answer, too bad you aren't perceptive enough to have seen what is there in black and white. Repeating oneself to one who doesn't want to see is tedious.
Click to expand...
I think you're content with repeating that tripe. You managed to bullshit yourself into believing it. It's probably wise to keep lying to yourself in order to maintain your cult member status.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncboy10
heelmanwilm said:
Trump’s approval rating is at 35%. He may think he loves America. But America sure as fuk doesnt love him right now.
Click to expand...

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/trump-approval-ratings/

41% according to 538 who is usually pretty solid.

That said, every sitting President since Truman at 47% or lower (Carter, H.W., Lyndon) did not win a second term (Lyndon didn't run but likely wouldn't have even won his own party shoutout Bobby K).

That said x2, polling with Trump has proven to be very inaccurate. More people support him than will admit in these polls as evidenced by 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terror Beard, heelmanwilm and heelbent
strummingram said:
I think you're content with repeating that tripe. You managed to bullshit yourself into believing it. It's probably wise to keep lying to yourself in order to maintain your cult member status.
Click to expand...
this is the kind of pointless idiocy one falls back on when he has no answer to anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Terror Beard
dadika13 said:
Lol you are freaking lost, needed that laugh this morning to start the week.

Trump couldn't name you 5 people who signed the Declaration of Independence let alone know their vision.

You're a sheep.
Click to expand...
..said the lemming.

you don't even have to able to name yourself in order to appreciate individual rights and freedom, and being rewarded for success without having to share it with the non-productive and citizens of other countries.. I wish I could say the finer points are lost on you, but the fact is the greater points are as well.
 
bluetoe said:
..said the lemming.

you don't even have to able to name yourself in order to appreciate individual rights and freedom, and being rewarded for success without having to share it with the non-productive and citizens of other countries.. I wish I could say the finer points are lost on you, but the fact is the greater points are as well.
Click to expand...

WJTbyQ.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: carolinablue34, uncboy10, heelmanwilm and 1 other person
heelmanwilm said:
there is not a single former republican presidential nominee on the planet that endorses trump. I find that hilarious.
Click to expand...
Who wants their endorsement anyway? Bunch of losers, and racists. I know he’s dead but Pappy Bush actually deployed the military during the LA riots versus DJT thinking about it. What a racist.
 
Jingoistic bullshitting wouldn’t be effective if there weren’t people dumb enough to believe it.
 
cletusnow said:
Who wants their endorsement anyway? Bunch of losers, and racists. I know he’s dead but Pappy Bush actually deployed the military during the LA riots versus DJT thinking about it. What a racist.
Click to expand...
Losers and racists comprise the bulk of trump supporters. So I’m sure he would love more.
 
strummingram said:
He wanted to, but his subordinates preferred the Constitution to himself.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...medium=website&utm_content=link&ICID=ref_fark

https://thiscantbehappening.net/in-...-troops-to-defend-constitution-not-president/
Click to expand...
He could’ve still made the call, but he didn’t. I know,I know, he was almost a racist if it makes you feel better. Hell, Lincoln usurped the constitution more than DJT. Lincoln actually had the military shoot rioters in NY.
 
cletusnow said:
He could’ve still made the call, but he didn’t. I know,I know, he was almost a racist if it makes you feel better. Hell, Lincoln usurped the constitution more than DJT. Lincoln actually had the military shoot rioters in NY.
Click to expand...
Well, by today's standards (maybe even by 19th century standards) Lincoln was a racist.

Trump is more narcissist than racist, but still racist enough to be considered a racist. Like I showed, he did make the call. His subordinates ignored and/or refused to follow his orders.
 
strummingram said:
Well, by today's standards (maybe even by 19th century standards) Lincoln was a racist.

Trump is more narcissist than racist, but still racist enough to be considered a racist. Like I showed, he did make the call. His subordinates ignored and/or refused to follow his orders.
Click to expand...
No where in those stories does it say the SecD or the other guy ignored or refused an order. Anonymous sources? Much like Russia collusion, these ‘anonymous sources’ seem to be full of shit. You should write for the NYT.
 
dadika13 said:
FIFY.

Dude the CJ of the SC said in 1857 that black people were not, should not, and cannot be equal to white people and don't deserve any rights.
Click to expand...
Sorry for leaving that out. I wasn't trying to imply or portray people of the past as being in social alignment with people of the present.
 
cletusnow said:
No where in those stories does it say the SecD or the other guy ignored or refused an order. Anonymous sources? Much like Russia collusion, these ‘anonymous sources’ seem to be full of shit. You should write for the NYT.
Click to expand...
I'll try to do better next time.
 
Well I just found out that Biden has a stutter. I had no idea. They might be a prob when dealing with a crisis.

“Sir the bombers have approached the fail safe point! What are your orders?”

“t-t-t-t-ellllllll themmmmmm -t-t-t-oo”

“too late, they’re over Moscow!”
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

andrew jones
  • Sticky

Transfer Portal Thread

Replies
8
Views
518
Blue Heaven
andrew jones
andrew jones
W

Game Thread

Replies
5
Views
331
Tar Heel Blitz
WoadBlue
W
andrew jones

LIVE: ACC TipOff Thread

Replies
22
Views
396
Four Corners
tarwhiz
T
andrew jones

Class of 2027 Thread (Update 9-24: SC WR intel added)

Replies
3
Views
573
Blue Heaven
Lee Wardlaw
L
S

American game

Replies
45
Views
2K
Tar Heel Radar
sctarheel30
S
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
Top Bottom
Back