So, you're content to believe that all of his rulings, opinions, dissensions, etc., reflect a conservative ideological bias and these are all just a coincidence. The link I provided showed that he always falls on the conservative side... always. Sometimes going further than right-leaning loyalists!
I'm glad it's gone this far. It's allowed me to see how his rulings have been even more dangerous and regressive.
From the link I offered you:
Abortion and birth control: Kavanaugh argued in a 2015 dissent that Obamacare's mandate for contraception coverage infringed on the rights of religious organizations, a stance some religious liberty groups have hailed. He also dissented from a decision last fall that permitted an undocumented immigrant teen to have an abortion — although some conservatives have accused him of being too cautious in that case, and have even called it grounds for keeping him off the Supreme Court.
It gets even better:
Net neutrality: He called the FCC’s net neutrality order an "unlawful” First Amendment violation in a 2017 dissent.
Federal regulations writ large: Kavanaugh’s net neutrality dissent also suggested he’s skeptical about the Supreme Court’s so-called Chevron doctrine, a 1984 precedent that said courts should tend to defer to federal agencies’ regulatory decisions when the agencies are interpreting ambiguous statutes. A move by conservative justices to overturn Chevron could lead to far tighter restrictions on federal regulatory powers.
After reading that article, this one stood out the most, to me:
Financial regulations: Kavanaugh delivered a huge victory to conservatives in October 2016 when he wrote an opinion declaring the structure of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — a powerful banking industry watchdog first envisioned by Elizabeth Warren — to be unconstitutional. Writing for a three-judge panel, Kavanaugh said the 2010 Dodd-Frank law had wrongly placed “enormous executive power” in the CFPB’s single director, which Republicans and the banking industry want to replace with a multi-member commission. Supporters of the CFPB accused Kavanaugh of acting as a partisan activist, and the constitutionality of the CFPB's structure was later upheld.
By all means, take the leash off of the banking sector again. They're practical, frugal and always think ahead and always act cautiously, don't they? What could POSSIBLY go wrong!?!?
If all of those offered in that link don't give you the slightest pause for concern, that his right-wing politics are at the wheel, then nothing will. He was on George W. Bush's legal team for the 2000 election, an we all now how well that turned out. No controversy there. A smooth transition all the way!
This boofer is straight out of the 19th century.
We all see what we want to see, apparently.
