K hasn't done any kind of coaching in 7-8 years. He assembles talent and hopes that what he's assembled can put up a good record and then get lucky in the tournament. He's a shell of his former self, which was a really good basketball mind.
I wouldn't have voted for Hubert for COY because I suffered through this season. The UT and UK blowouts shouldn't be factored in but to anyone that watched, they are. But with that said, I would have no idea how any ACC coach could win the award this year. Everybody sucked. I mean, I guess WFU finished considerably above where they were projected and by that criteria, I don't have any issue with Forbes winning. And they made a huge leap from where they were last year.
But I have a major beef with Bacot not winning ACC POY. That seems unimaginable after his domination on Saturday night. I didn't think it should be particularly close before Saturday as I thought Bacot's numbers were ridiculous - Tim Duncan like. But for certain Saturday should have been the difference maker. I mean Bacot didn't get a double-double but he did go 10/11 from the field and had his way with the ACC DPOY. It's a travesty that Bacot didn't win. Highway robbery if you ask me. The rationale doesn't make sense. If Forbes is the COY, then evaluating Williams against a guy whose coach wasn't COY should also favor Bacot. Bacot's numbers were just better too. I think he averaged 14 rpg in conference play. That's absurd.