I don't think he was trying to say everything is Roy's fault, just that him not adapting to the current environment has contributed to us losing some recruits. To me the graphic was irrelevant to the point at hand. What does Roy winning tournament games in 2005 have to do with him missing out on recruits partly because his style hasn't adjusted? If the conversation was about Roy's on court performance then that would have been a good graphic, but it didn't add anything to that conversation. Just another way to deflect when someone was saying something that didn't make Roy look like the second coming.His argument seems to be that we are failing and everything is Roy's fault. I will not waste my time arguing with someone so myopic and reductionist.